Turkish Society of Cardiology Young Cardiologists
President Dr. Muzaffer Değertekin
Coordinator for the Board of Directors Dr. Ertuğrul Okuyan
Coordinator for the Board of Directors Dr. Can Yücel Karabay
Members
Dr. Adem Aktan
Dr. Gülşah Aktüre
Dr. Bayram Arslan
Dr. İnanç Artaç
Dr. Ahmet Oğuz Aslan
Dr. Görkem Ayhan
Dr. Ahmet Anıl Başkurt
Dr. Özkan Bekler
Dr. Oğuzhan Birdal
Dr. Yusuf Bozkurt Şahin
Dr. Serkan Bulgurluoğlu
Dr. Ümit Bulut
Dr. Veysi Can
Dr. Mustafa Candemir
Dr. Murat Çap
Dr. Göksel Çinier
Dr. Ali Çoner
Dr. Yusuf Demir
Dr. Ömer Furkan Demir
Dr. Murat Demirci
Dr. Ayşe İrem Demirtola Mammadli
Dr. Süleyman Çağan Efe
Dr. Mehmet Akif Erdöl
Dr. Kubilay Erselcan
Dr. Kerim Esenboğa
Dr. Duygu Genç
Dr. Kemal Göçer
Dr. Elif Güçlü
Dr. Arda Güler
Dr. Duygu İnan
Dr. Hasan Burak İşleyen
Dr. Muzaffer Kahyaoğlu
Dr. Sedat Kalkan
Dr. Yücel Kanal
Dr. Özkan Karaca
Dr. Ahmet Karaduman
Dr. Mustafa Karanfil
Dr. Ayhan Kol
Dr. Fatma Köksal
Dr. Mevlüt Serdar Kuyumcu
Dr. Yunus Emre Özbebek
Dr. Ahmet Özderya
Dr. Yasin Özen
Dr. Ayşenur Özkaya İbiş
Dr. Çağlar Özmen
Dr. Selvi Öztaş
Dr. Hasan Sarı
Dr. Serkan Sivri
Dr. Ali Uğur Soysal
Dr. Hüseyin Tezcan
Dr. Nazlı Turan
Dr. Berat Uğuz
Dr. Örsan Deniz Urgun
Dr. İdris Yakut
Dr. Mustafa Yenerçağ
Dr. Mehmet Fatih Yılmaz
Dr. Yakup Yiğit
Dr. Mehmet Murat Yiğitbaşı
|
|
|
|
 REBOOT/BETAMI/DANBLOCK/CAPITAL-RCT: Beta-Blockers after MI with Mildly Reduced EF (an IPD meta-analysis)Türk Kardiyoloji Derneği Genç Kardiyologlar Bülteni - REBOOT/BETAMI/DANBLOCK/CAPITAL-RCT: Beta-Blockers after MI with Mildly Reduced EF (an IPD meta-analysis) (Dr. Mehmet Murat Yiğitbaşı)Study title: REBOOT/BETAMI/DANBLOCK/CAPITAL-RCT: Beta-Blockers after MI with Mildly Reduced EF (an IPD meta-analysis)
Presented at Congress: ESC Congress 2025 – Hot Line 3
Link: https://esc365.escardio.org/presentation/312161
Prepared by: Dr. Mehmet Murat Yiğitbaşı
Introduction
The benefits of beta-blockers after myocardial infarction (MI) are well established in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF <40%). However, in patients with mildly reduced LVEF (40–49%) and no clinical heart failure, the long-term effects of beta-blocker therapy have been uncertain.
Objective
To evaluate the effect of beta-blockers on the composite of all-cause death, new MI, or heart failure in patients with recent MI, mildly reduced LVEF (40–49%), and no history/signs of heart failure, by pooling individual patient data (IPD) from contemporary randomized trials.
Methods
Prespecified IPD meta-analysis including four randomized trials conducted in the reperfusion era: REBOOT (Spain/Italy), BETAMI (Norway), DANBLOCK (Denmark), and CAPITAL-RCT (Japan). Eligibility: randomization within 14 days after MI; LVEF 40–49%; no history or signs of heart failure; median follow-up >1 year; oral beta-blocker strategy versus no beta-blocker. A one-stage fixed-effects model was used to estimate the treatment effect on the predefined primary composite endpoint of all-cause death, new MI, or heart failure.
Results
A total of 1,885 patients were analyzed (REBOOT n=979; BETAMI n=422; DANBLOCK n=430; CAPITAL-RCT n=54). The primary composite endpoint occurred in 10.7% with beta-blockers versus 14.4% with no beta-blocker, yielding a 25% relative risk reduction (HR 0.75; 95% CI 0.58–0.97; p=0.031). No meaningful heterogeneity was observed across trials or enrolling countries. Component endpoints showed concordant trends: all-cause death 5.9% vs 7.7% (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.55–1.11), new MI 3.9% vs 5.2% (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.55–1.11), and heart failure 3.0% vs 4.4% (HR 0.71; 95% CI 0.44–1.14). Cardiac death showed a numerical reduction (1.8% vs 3.3%; HR 0.55; 95% CI 0.28–1.06).
Conclusion
In post-MI patients with mildly reduced LVEF (40–49%) and no clinical heart failure, long-term beta-blocker therapy significantly reduced the composite of all-cause death, new MI, or heart failure compared with no beta-blocker therapy, extending the evidence base from reduced LVEF into the mildly reduced range.
Commentary
These findings support sustained beta-blocker therapy after MI in the 40–49% LVEF subgroup. Uncertainty remains for patients with preserved LVEF >50%, warranting additional dedicated trials. Treatment decisions should consider contraindications (e.g., bradycardia, hypotension, conduction disease, bronchospasm) and individual tolerability.

|